Museums Aotearoa Submission on the Draft Visual Arts Curriculum

Ministry of Education 22 April 2026

Museums Aotearoa Submission on the Draft Visual Arts Curriculum

Purpose

The purpose of this document is to summarise our position on the Ministry of Education’s Draft Visual Arts Curriculum, so we might provide a clear sector position on matters of importance to arts, culture and heritage and our members in public museums and galleries.

Who we are

Museums Aotearoa represents public museums and galleries across the country. Our sector comprises around 500 institutions throughout New Zealand and the people who work within them, both paid and unpaid. Our members look after New Zealand’s most precious collections. They do that as stewards on behalf of future generations and because they are meeting needs and expectations of communities, government and individuals who bequeath their valued treasures for safekeeping, exhibition and education. As the sector’s chief advocate, we see our primary role as raising the gaze of decisionmakers from individual spending decisions to systemic sector impacts. One way we do that is by advocating for legislative change that delivers clarity, certainty and financial sustainability for the museum and gallery sector so we can serve New Zealand into the future. On behalf of our member museums and galleries across New Zealand, we submit our feedback to the Governance and Administration Committee.

Our response Our overarching concerns are threefold:

  • The draft curriculum is too vague, which will rely too heavily upon the individual abilities of teachers to implement and will result in greatly different student outcomes when this curriculum is enacted.
  • The draft curriculum reflects a poor understanding of the value of Art History and its differences from Visual Art, by diminishing Art History to a subset of Visual Art, which in turn diminishes the value that students will ascribe and gain from Art History.
  • Each teaching year and phase should more distinctly, and clearly build upon one another to establish confidence towards the use of more advanced art terminology which students will begin to encounter and seek out in their art gallery and museum experiences.

Removing Art History as a standalone subject will have direct implications for sustaining university Art History courses, and will detract from the already dwindling pipeline of jobs in the strained Arts sector. The removal of Art History - fails to see the value in such a fundamental, academically robust, knowledge-rich subject. Art History is a deeply human subject, and one which creates critical, nuanced thinkers.

The removal of Art History as a standalone subject signals a diminishment of the focus and attention necessary for students to understand the value that Art History can give them for critically engaging in our visual media saturated world. We urge you to not take away opportunities for students of all backgrounds to access the skills that Art History offers, skills that will enable them to engage fully with the arts, culture and heritage of Aotearoa in the future as arts and museum workers, volunteers, audiences and patrons.

We share with you just a small number of testimonials we have received from people whose lives have been touched by Art History:

“Removing Art History will take away the opportunity of seeing and understanding art as part of our culture and society for students. It will dumb down our population by removing access at a high school level to the language and understandings it encompasses, understandings which help us empathise and make sense of how other people, across cultures and history, have seen and represented their world.” “

As individuals we would lose critical thinking skills. Art history is not memorising dates; it’s interpreting, analysing, and debating. Removing it strips students of a discipline that trains nuanced thought.”

“It is so disappointing to see us moving away from art and creativity, it breaks my heart.”

“Engaging in Art History has made me a strong writer, expanded my vocabulary, improved my articulation and made me a more well-rounded individual. [...] Art History has opened so many doors that I never knew existed. [...] Art History is robust, academic, challenging, enlightening, heartbreaking, joyous and human!”

Governance

Government

Research

Tauhere: Emerging Museum Professional's Publication

MA Impact Report